Let me make it clear first that I don’t think Mahendra Singh Dhoni deserves to be in India’s Test team anymore. He was never a top-class wicketkeeper. He was in the team because, as he himself pointed out after claiming the 200th victim in Tests, he was a “package”. Aggressive batting and smart captaincy made him that. Batting has failed him for quite some time now, and the less said about his captaincy in the longest version of the game, the better. So I am not here to defend Dhoni’s place in the Test team. Nor am I defending his insipid captaincy in England and Australia this season. What I am out to defend is his integrity, which I think, is quite extraordinary.
Some of the criticism he has attracted in the wake of India’s seven Test
defeats on the trot abroad is personal, illogical and inappropriate. I find it
strange that he is being hauled up for some unusually honest remarks and some
critics are calling him arrogant for saying things any humble professional
should say.
The two things that have drawn most criticism for Dhoni since the Sydney
loss are: India’s go-karting session and the Indian captain’s comment that he
may retire from Tests in 2013.
While I, too, am still angry with the Indian team for skipping practice
after huge losses and opting for go-karting, I don’t understand why that should
be counted as an example of Dhoni’s arrogance. Didn’t the whole team go? There
haven’t been any reports that the captain had forced anybody to go or the team
management had made it mandatory to go. In fact, vice-captain Virender Sehwag,
Rahul Dravid et al did not go, giving rise to the notion that there is a rift
in the team. Let’s not go into that. Even those who went were obviously not
taken on gunpoint by the skipper. So why blame his attitude and say this is
something he has instilled into the team during his tenure? We are talking
about grown-ups here, isn’t it? Is it possible to spoon feed them one person’s
attitude? Preposterous!
Dhoni’s comment that he may give up playing one format (obviously Tests)
to be fit and in-form for the 2015 World Cup has also received caustic
criticism from all quarters. Everybody has interpreted it as proof of Dhoni’s
lack of interest or love for Test cricket. Maybe that is the case, but if you
believe Dhoni does not deserve to be in our Test side then why are you angry?
You want him out of the team anyway. What I derive from that comment is: Dhoni,
being the reasonable he is, has understood that he cannot perform in Tests
outside the subcontinent. One look at the Future Tours Programme and you will
know Team India don’t step outside the subcontinent before 2013. So our World
Cup-winning captain doesn’t want to be the team’s burden, which he has been in
England and Australia. While the more knowledgible cricket pundits see a
selfish agenda there, I see the opposite: an effort to put the team’s interest
before one’s reputation. Somebody who knows his limitation and works
accordingly should be respected, not lambasted.
But, of course, critics say the Chennai Super Kings captain is more
interested in the quick money of the Indian Premier League than the rigours of
Test cricket. I have already refuted the point of taking his retirement as his
disinterest in Tests, now come to the point of his interest in IPL riches. This
point is the perfect example of Indian media’s holier-than-thou attitude. While
everybody in every walk of life is running after money, we expect our
cricketers to be altruists and philanthropists of the first order. Absurd!
Doctors working in government hospitals practise privately, we don’t object.
School teachers run private coaching centres, we don’t object. Media houses get
into private agreements, we don’t object. But we all become knights in shining
armours if our cricketers want to play IPL.
Unlike teachers or doctors or journalists, cricketers do not belong to
the salaried class. So I don’t see a problem if they want to earn big through
IPL and secure their future. Once they hang up their boots, neither the critics
nor I would be there to look after their families. Playing for the country
should obviously be the priority but I don’t see Dhoni is preferring IPL over
the country. Had that been the case, the man would not have wanted to continue
playing ODIs and play the next World Cup. There is no reason to liken him to
Chris Gayle who gives a damn to playing for the West Indies, and is happy
playing in T20 leagues all over the world. I won’t blame Dhoni if he, like
Shaquille O’Neal, says: “I’m tired of hearing about money, money, money. I just
want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok.”
My liking for Dhoni, the Test cricketer, has gone down after his spate
of poor performances but my respect for Dhoni, the man, has gone up a few
notches after he said: “I am the culprit” after India lost in two-and-a-half
days at the WACA. Criticise him as much as you like, but tell me honestly, how
many times have you heard an Indian captain blame himself like that after a
horrible series loss?
I believe we are all up in arms against Dhoni not because he has
presided over some of our worst losses in history but because we don’t like any
successful person leaving his place gracefully, even though we say just the
opposite. We actually like to see the person struggle so that we can pinch him,
kick him, devour him. We become angry if we are denied that chance. I remember
the helpless anger of the opposition when Jyoti Basu gave up the chief
ministership of West Bengal. Mamata Banerjee went to the extent of saying the
Left Front should seek fresh mandate even though it had clear majority in the
Assembly.
Are we a sadist nation? Maybe. But can’t we give Dhoni a break from our
sadism, considering he has also given us some of the best moments in our
cricketing history?
3 comments:
I agree that Dhoni has often been criticized unfairly, whether he is successful as a captain and player, or not. I sometimes feel that we can't tolerate a person of such a humble background becoming one of the most adorable celebrities, an icon. There is no denying the fact that he was never a class batsman or a wicketkeeper, but at the same time he has been extremely effective. After the world cup was won, many suggested that he has reaped the benefits of his predecessors, especially Ganguly. I don't see much logic behind that, 'coz the team was in a very bad shape during and after the 2007 World Cup. The bottom-line is that he is not responsible for the successes of the team, but he is guilty of all the failures!! However, I feel that the decision of giving up tests could be announced after the series; it is natural to view this as an attempt to draw sympathy during a pathetic series. I liked his blaming himself as the main culprit. I think he also knows, that if he loses the test captaincy, he will not be able to stay in the test team for long.
Well, the backlash over that go-karting session is childish. As if weeping inconsolably in a dark room was what they should have done. Time for fans and media to grow up. What they do outside should be nobody's business, unless there is a serious committment or discipline issues.
On his test-exit policy, I still feel it was ill-timed. I won't be surprised if it was his ploy to divert media attention from the team's struggle Down Under. It's his choice, you like it or not, but feel it shouldn't have come 24 hours before a test match.
Also, Dhoni, by virtue of being in the BCCI grade, is a salaried cricketer :) Also, while I admit he's probably not worth his place in the test team but show me a better 'keeper and another guy who can take over the test reigns. It's lack of option that will keep Dhoni India's test captain. Said a lot!
Dada, by salaried i meant an assured amount every month/year whatever your performance, and pension after retirement. That is what doctors or teachers get, isn't it?
Post a Comment